Friday 30 March 2012

POWER OF CONCENTRATION-FOCUS


RAHSIA DAN KEMAHIRAN KONSENTRASI (TUMPUAN)

Kuasa dan keupayaan membuat tumpuan adalah merupakan aset yang sangat berguna kepada pelajar-pelajar bestari. Manusia  bestari sentiasa mencari kemahiran untuk meningkatkan daya tumpu supaya daya fikir dan daya ingat sentiasa meningkat dan bertambah.

Syarat-syarat untuk membuat kosentrasi:
a. Duduk tegak dengan selesa
b. Keikhlasan hati dan kebersihan jiwa.
c. Guna mata dengan sepenuhnya membuat pandangan dan tumpuan.
d. Guna telinga untuk menapis dan membuang bunyi yang tidak penting.
e. Sentiasa mencatat dan menulis.
f. Mendapat cukup makanan seimbang terutamanya
- Vitamin B daripada bijirin
- Vitamin C daripada buahan segar seperti jambu batu dan
papaya.
- Mineral surih daripada sayur, buah dan ulam.
g. Riadah Nafas dengan menarik nafas dalam, tahan dan lepaskan.
h. Doa.


COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE TO SUSTAINABLE COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE


The basic assumption in strategic management is that firms strive to achieve position that will enable them to outperform its competitors and earn higher revenues. When a firm can perform something better than other organization, the firm is said to have a competitive advantage. 

 Competitive advantage is defined as anything that a firm does exceptionally well compared to its ri¬vals. Competitive advantage allows a firm to outperform its competitors. A firm gains competitive advantage when it is able to perform activities that other companies are unable to duplicate. A company's competitive advantage may be its superior customer service innovative products, strong distribution channels or low pricing—something unique that the firm offers and which sets them apart. Some companies such as Dell and Amazon establish competitive advantages by introducing more ef¬ficient business models. By removing the distributors and avoiding expensive retail showrooms, Dell was able to post high-profit margins while selling its products cheaper than its established competitors. Similarly, Amazon.com's business model of a centralized distribution model allows it to manage inventory much more efficiently than traditional book retailers and has provided Amazon.com a competitive advantage over its rivals. Obtaining and maintaining the firm's competitive advantage is crucial to a firm's survival.

Sustained competitive advantage comes from maintaining higher profits than competitors over long periods of time. Sustained competitive advantage refers to a competitive advantage that firms can maintain for a long period of time. However, a firm can only sustain its competitive advantage for a certain period of time.

However, it can be difficult for a company to develop a sustained competitive advantage because this means that the company must possess value creating resources or capabilities that cannot be imitated by any firms nor made redundant or obsolete by developments in the external environment. The rapid changes in the environment often make it difficult for organizations to develop a com¬petitive advantage that can be sustained for a long period of time. Microsoft, the technology leader in the PC industry for almost a decade, is now facing stiff competition from Google. Its latest version of Windows Vista was a di¬saster and many critics now say that Google is the defining company in the industry today (Levy, 2008).

There are two views that seek to explain why some firms are able to achieve greater advantages over their rivals: resource-based view (RBV) and the industrial/organizational (I/O) view. Both these views are discussed in the following sections.

Resource-based View
The resource-based view (RBV) states that a firm's resources (such as skills, financial resources, human resources and physical resources) are most im¬portant in getting and sustaining a company's competitive advantage.
Resource-based view is a strategic management idea that each firm is unique and possesses resources and capabilities that provide the basis for its competitive advantage.

According to the RBV view, organizational performance will be determined by the skills and resources that it possesses, and these key assets will give the firm a competitive advantage. Since the set of resources and competencies to make use of these resources are unique to each firm, firms with superior resources and capabilities tend to enjoy greater competitive advantage over other firms. Competitive advantage is achieved when a firm is able to devel¬op its competencies successfully from the resources it possesses, and when these competencies are developed especially well, they become the source of the firm's competitive advantages.

Industrial/Organizational View
The industrial/organizational (I/O) view originates from Michael Porter of the Harvard Business School. The I/O view contends that the industry in which the firm chooses to compete has a stronger influence on the firm's performance than the firm's internal resources such as management, mar¬keting or finance. Industrial/ Organizational view explains that a firm': performance is strongly influenced by its external environment. According to this view, the industry which a firm chooses to compete has a stronger influence c the firm's performance than the resources or capabilities that possesses.
Organizations that compete in attractive industries, avoiding weak or faltering industries and having a full understanding of key external factors, their relationships within that attractive industry would be in a more advantageous position. While the resource-based view is internal, the focus of the I/O view is external. Getting and keeping competitive advantage according to the I/O perspective means analysing the external environment forces (such as economies of scale, level of competitiveness, product differ¬entiation and availability of substitute goods) and basing strategic decisions on what is happening out there.

THE BEST PRESENTATION CAN BE LEARNED


MAJOR COMPONENTS OF SP-DOWN TO ACTION


Evolution of Strategic management:


In the previous days, talking about the 1920’s till 1930’s, the managers used to work out the day-to-day planning method. Till this time they do not concentrate about the future work. However after this period, managers have tried to anticipate and predict about the future happenings. They started using tools like preparation of Budgets and control system like capital budgeting. However these techniques and tools also failed to emphasize the role of future adequately.

Then long-range planning came into picture, giving the idea of planning for the long-term future. But it was soon replaced by Strategic planning and later by Strategic management term that is currently being used to describe the process of Strategic decision-making. The first phase of the planning can be tracked in the mid of 1930’s. The planning at that period was done on the premises of Ad Hoc policy making. The reason why the need for planning arose at that period was that, many businesses had just about started operations and were mostly in a single product line and the ranges of operation were in a limited area. As these companies grew they expanded their products and also increased their geographical coverage. The method of using informal control and coordination was not enough and became irrelevant as these companies expanded. Thus arose a need to integrate functional areas. Framing policies to guide managerial actions covered this task of integration. Policies helped to have predefined set of actions, which helped the manager to make decisions. Policy-making became the way owners managed their business and it was considered their prime responsibility.

Thus, the increasing environment changes in the 1930’s and 1940’s planned policy formation replaced Ad Hoc policy making, which led to the shifting of emphasis to the integration of the functional areas in a policy changing environment, showing an indication of the evolution of Strategic management.

The Importance of Strategic management:

1. Strategic management is a wide concept and encompasses all functions and thus it seeks to integrate the knowledge and experience gained in various functional areas of management.

2. It enables one to understand and make sense of the complex interaction that takes place between different functional areas.

3. There are many constraints and complexities, which the Strategic management deals with. In order to develop a theoretical structure of its own, Strategic management cuts across the narrow functional boundaries. This in turn helps to create an understanding of how policies are formulated and also creating a Strategic Management  solution of the complexities of the environment that the senior management faces in policy formulation.

In Search of a strategic Thinker


The term strategic thinking is used in so many ways that it is diffi cult to determine what people mean when they use it. In fact, most people probably do not know exactly what they mean: they may use the word to mean “thinking about strategy ” or use it interchangeably with “ strategic management ” or “ strategic planning. ”  According to a well - known strategist, Henry Mintzberg, strategic planning is an analytical process aimed at carrying out strategies that have  already been identifi ed. Strategic planning results in the creation of a plan. On the other hand, strategic thinking involves intuition and creativity. It is a way to synthesize stimuli from the internal and external nvironments to create “ an integrated perspective of the enterprise. ”  According to Mintzberg, strategic planning is so rigid that it tends to drive out creative - thinking processes. The following true story illustrates his point. However, many companies, especially larger ones, have strategic planning processes that mirror the ones described in this example.


When Arlington Hospitality began the search for a new CEO, it asked candidates to draft “ strategic white papers ” presenting their opinions on the future direction of the company. Candidates who did not have an intellectual focus or vision for the firm or who presented status quo thinking were eliminated. The company was in search of a strategic thinker, who possesses the six characteristics of strategic thinking:


1. Intent - focused
2. Comprehensive
3. Opportunistic
4. Long - term oriented
5. Built on the past and the present
6. Hypothesis - driven

SWOT


Strengths: attributes of the person or company those are helpful to achieving the objective(s).
Weaknesses: attributes of the person or company those are harmful to achieving the objective(s).
Opportunities: external conditions that are helpful to achieving the objective(s).
Threats: external conditions which could do damage to the objective(s).

EXAMPLE OF ASSIGNMENT – ACADEMIC PAPER



STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT IN MALAYSIAN SMEs: AN EMPIRICAL ASSESSMENT
MOHAMED SULAIMAN - School of Management, Universiti Sains Malaysia SYED AZIZI WAFA - School of Business and Economics, Universiti Malaysia Sabah MOHD KHAIRUDDIN HASHIM - Faculty of Business Management, Universiti Utara Malaysia
________________________________________
ABSTRACT

The notion that strategic management is an important management process that can help firms manage their resources, develop competitive advantage and create their future has resulted in extensive literature in this area. While a number of empirical studies have investigated strategic management practices in large firms, little research has focused on this area of management in small- and medium-size enterprises (SMEs), particularly in the Malaysian context. This study initiates an attempt to address this issue. This study, which is part of a larger study, reports findings that indicate owners and managers of SMEs used rational strategic management practices as well as adopted business strategies as espoused in the literature.

INTRODUCTION

Strategic management is a source of significant benefits for businesses operating in a competitive environment. Strategic management can assist firms make effective decisions and strategies by staying alert to the threats and opportunities in an uncertain and dynamic environment. In addition to assisting firms to make effective decisions as well as effective strategies, strategic management can help improve their performance.

In fact, the literature suggests that the increased practice of strategic management in organizations results from the growing evidence that indicates effective strategic management can help improve organizational performance.

The notion that strategic management is important for a firm's success or failure has produced an extensive stream of literature (Burn and Stalker, 1961; Chandler, 1962; Lawrence and Lorsch, 1967; Wood and Laforge, 1979; Rumelt, 1986; Rue and Holland, 1986 and 1989; Bracker et al. 1988; and Kotha and Nair; 1995). However, in the aggregate, empirical studies have concentrated on large firms in Western business society.

Surprisingly, this related issue of concern has received minimal attention in the small business literature in Malaysia. Despite the importance of SMEs and the increase in knowledge in strategic management, few empirical studies have examined SMEs from this perspective. This study is presented to address this issue. This study reports empirical findings of a larger study that suggest Malaysian SMEs do adopt rational strategic management process as advocated in the literature. More specifically, this study provides an insight into the nature of the strategic management process that took place in Malaysian SMEs and the types of business strategies they adopted.

Strategic management and Organization.

Strategic Management and Organizations are two components that work closely together in order to achieve long term goal.

Wheelen and Hunger (1999) noted that strategic management is a rapidly developing field of study that has emerged in response to increasing environmental turbulence. According to the authors, this area of study looks at managing the organization as a whole and attempts to explain why some organizations performed well while others did not.

The scope of the strategic management process covers organization-wide issues in the context of a whole range of environment influences. The strategic management process involves organization, management and the environment as a whole. Thus, in understanding the strategic management process and how it works, a general knowledge of the organization, its internal and external environments and management is required.

As an open system, a business organization will survive and succeed by acquiring and maintaining its resources. Businesses are embedded in an external environment which consists of other organizations. They depend on those other organizations for the many resources they themselves require. The business organizations are linked to the external environments by federations, associations, customer-supplier relationships, competitive relationships, and a social-legal apparatus defining and controlling the nature and limits of these relationships. Business organizations, therefore, must transact with these elements in order to acquire the needed resources, and this is true for public, private, small, large, bureaucratic or organic organizations (Burns and Stalker, 1961).

Pfeffer and Salanick (1978) stressed that problems arise not merely because organizations are dependent on their environment, but because the environment is not dependable. According to the authors, environments can change, new firms enter and exit, and the supply of resources becomes more or less scarce. When environments change, firms face the prospect either of not surviving or of changing their activities in response to these factors. Therefore, to survive and become effective, a firm must be capable of making adaptations to the changing situations. It is due to these continuous changes that business organizations need a more powerful management process like strategic management to cope successfully.

The Strategic Management Process

Strategic management is a systematic resource-based process for making major decisions in organizations. It attempts to organize meaningful assets and skills, information, and competitive arenas in a manner that allows effective decisions and strategies to be made under conditions of uncertainty (Aaker, 1989 and David, 1999).

Although there is no one universally accepted definition or way of practising strategic management, the review of the normative and empirical works suggests that the strategic management process involves the following basic dimensions:


1. Strategy Formulation

In the strategic management process, the strategy formulation phase involves the development of long-term strategic plans for effective management of environmental opportunities and threats, in light of a firm's strengths and weaknesses. The formulation of strategy includes defining the firm's mission, targeted objectives, developing strategies, and establishing policy guidelines.

2. Strategy Implementation

In the strategy implementation - often called the action phase -the firm is required to translate its strategies and policies into action through the development of specific budgets and procedures. In this phase, the necessary changes are also made within the organizational culture, structure  divisions, departments, products), and the relationships between these
elements and the managerial levels among the top, middle and lower levels of the organization.

3. Strategy Evaluation and Control

The strategic evaluation and control is the final phase of the strategic management process. The strategic evaluation involves obtaining information about the strategic plans and performance, and comparing the information with the targeted objectives. Finally, the strategic control involves taking the necessary corrective measures to bring activities into conformity with the
strategic plan.

In addition to the above dimensions, the strategic management process emphasizes the importance of gathering and the use of environmental information. The environmental information which is collected through situational analysis can assist an organization in identifying and understanding the factors that contribute to its ability to develop effective strategies as well as achieve its objectives efficiently and effectively.

Thompson and Strickland, (1999), Johnson and Scholes (1988), and Graig and Grant (1993) indicated that the strategic analysis process comprises the external analysis such as the industry situation analysis and competitive situation analysis, and internal analysis (company situation analysis).

Courtney, Kirkland and Viguerie (1997) stressed that situational analysis is still relevant to companies formulating and implementing strategies in an uncertain business environment. The authors noted that all strategy making begins with some form of situational analysis. The authors emphasized that to cope with different levels of uncertainty, organizations need different analytical approaches to determine the best possible
strategies.

Apart from the situational analysis, there are authors who suggested strategic thinking and strategic readiness as the other important conditions for strategic management to be carried out effectively. For instance, Ohmae (1982) stressed that strategic analysis is the starting point of strategic thinking. According to the author, the aim of strategy is to bring about the conditions most favourable to a business by way of realistic responses to changing situations.

Christensen (1997) also suggested that organizations need to develop competency in strategic thinking in order to conceive and implement creative and coherent strategies.

In addition to strategic thinking, Redding and Catalanello (1994) emphasized that strategic readiness or an organization's readiness for change will determine how well strategy will be formulated and implemented. The authors also stressed that firms need to consider the two additional conditions prior to formulating and implementing their strategies, that is, defining the organization's purpose (what an organization exists to do),and discovering insights (insights into how to create value).

While most of previous theoretical and empirical contributions to strategic management were developed for use by large firms, lately, the literature suggests that researchers are acknowledging the suitability and applicability of strategic management in SMEs.

Earlier work on strategic management in SMEs can be traced to the studies by Gilmore (1966 and 1971). More recently,Tourangeau (1981), Curtis (1983), Wheelen and Hunger (1995),Scarborough and Zimmerer (1996, and 1998) and David (1999) have stressed the need for strategic management in SMEs.

Although knowledge in the area of strategic management has expanded,  researchers investigating SMEs have given limited attention to this area of management, particularly in the Malaysian context. In Malaysia, studies that examine SMEs from the strategic management perspective are still very rare (Sim, 1991, Sim and Yap 1997, and Hashim, 2000).


CONCLUSIONS


In conclusion, the findings of this paper provide us an insight into the nature of the strategic management process that occurs in Malaysian. As a whole, the findings of the paper suggest that organization sector have the ability to adopt some form of rational strategic management process as described in the strategic management literature. Hence, this paper has taken us a step closer to understanding strategic management in organization

REFERENCES

Aaker, David A (1989). Managing Assets and Skills: The Key to a Sustainable Competitive Advantage, California Management Review, Winter: 91-106.

Burns, T and Stalker, G M (1961). The Management of Innovation, London: Tavistock.

Bracker, Jeffrey S, Keats, Barbara W and Pearson, John N (1988). Planning and Financial Performance Among Small Firms in a Growth Industry, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 9: 591-603.

Chandler, Alfred D, Jr. (1962). Strategy and Structure, Massachusetts: MIT Press.

Christensen, Clayton M (1997). Making Strategy: Learning By Doing, Harvard Business Review, November-December: 141-156.

Courtney, Hugh, Kirkland, Jane and Viguerie (1997). Strategy Under Uncertainty, Harvard Business Review, November-December: 67-79.

Craig, James C and Grant Robert M (1993), Strategic Management, London: Kogan Page Limited.

Curtis, David A (1983). Strategic Planning For Smaller Business, Massachusettes: Lexington Books.

David, Fred R (1999). Concepts of Strategic Management, 7th ed., New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.

Galbraith, Craig and Schendel, Dan (1983). An Empirical Analysis of Strategy Types, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 4: 153-173.

Gilmore, Frank F (1966). Strategic Planning's Threat to Small Business. California Management Review. Vol.19, No.2: 43-50.

Gilmore, Frank F (1971). Formulating Strategy in Smaller Companies, Harvard Business Review, May-June: 97-107.

Hashim, Mohd Khairuddin and Abdullah, Mat Saad (2000). In Abdullah and Bakar (eds) (2000), Small and Medium Enterprises in Asian Pacific Countries, New York: Nova Science Publishers, Inc.

Johnson, Gerry and Scholes, Kevan (1988). Exploring Corporate Strategy, London: Prentice Hall.  Kotha, S and Nair A (1995). Strategy and Environment as Determinants of Performance: Evidence from the Japanese Machine Tool Industry, Strategic Management Journal, Vol.16, No.7: 497-518).

Lawrence, P and Lorsch, J W (1967). Organization and Its Environment, Boston: Harvard University Press.

Ohmae, Kenichi (1982). The Mind of the Strategist, New York: McGraw-Hill Inc.  Pfeffer, Jeffery and Salancik (1978). The External Control of Organizations, New York: Harper and Row Publishers.

Porter, Michael E (1980). Competitive Strategy, New York: The Free Press.  Redding, John C and Catalanello, Ralph F (1994). Strategic Readiness, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.

Robinson, Richard B, Jr. and Pearce II, John A (1983). The Impact of Formalised Strategic Planning on Financial Performance in Small Organizations, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 4: 197-207.

Rue, Leslie W and Holland, Phyllis G (1986). Strategic Management: Concepts and Experience, 1st ed., New York: McGraw Hill.

Rue, Leslie W and Holland, Phyllis G (1989). Strategic Management: Concepts and Experience, 2nd ed., New York: McGraw Hill.

Rumelt, Richard D (1986). Strategy, Structure and Economic Performance, Boston: Harvard Business School Press.  Sim, A B (1991). Turnaround for Small Businesses-A Synthesis of Determinants for Action Research, With Reference to Malaysia, Malaysian Management Review, Vol.26, No.3, December: 15-22.

Sim, A B and Yap, Teoh Hai (1997). Strategy Types in Malaysian Industrial Companies, Malaysian Management Review, Vol. 32, No.4, December: 1-10.

Thompson, Arthur A, Jr. and Strickland III, A J (1999). Strategic Management: Concepts and Cases, 11th ed., Singapore: Irwin/McGraw-Hil .

Tourangeau, Kevin W (1981). Strategy Management, Toronto: Grolier Incorporated.

Wheelen, Thomas L and Hunger, David J (1995). Strategic
Management and Business Policy, Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley
Publishing Company.

Wood, D Robley Jr. and LaForge, R Lawrence (1979). The Impact of Comprehensive Planning on Financial Performance, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 22, No. 3: 516-526.

Zimmerer, Thomas W and Scarborough, Norman M (1996). Effective Small Business Management, 2nd ed., New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.

Zimmerer, Thomas W and Scarborough, Norman M (1998). Essentials of Entrepreneurship and Small Business Management, 2nd edn., New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.

VALUE CHAIN


The Value Chain
The term ‘Value Chain’ was used by Michael Porter in his book "Competitive Advantage: Creating and
Sustaining superior Performance" (1985). The value chain analysis describes the activities the organization performs and links them to the organizations competitive position.
Value chain analysis describes the activities within and around an organization, and relates them to an
analysis of the competitive strength of the organization. Therefore, it evaluates which value each particular activity adds to the organizations products or services. This idea was built upon the insight that
an organization is more than a random compilation of machinery, equipment, people and money. Only
if these things are arranged into systems and systematic activates it will become possible to produce
something for which customers are willing to pay a price. Porter argues that the ability to perform particular activities and to manage the linkages between these activities is a source of competitive advantage.

Porter distinguishes between primary activities and support activities. Primary activities are directly
concerned with the creation or delivery of a product or service. They can be grouped into five main
areas: inbound logistics, operations, outbound logistics, marketing and sales, and service. Each of
these primary activities is linked to support activities which help to improve their effectiveness or efficiency.
There are four main areas of support activities: procurement, technology development (including
R&D), human resource management, and infrastructure (systems for planning, finance, quality,
information management etc.).

The basic model of Porters Value Chain is as follows:


The term ‚Margin’ implies that organizations realize a profit margin that depends on their ability to
manage the linkages between all activities in the value chain. In other words, the organization is able
to deliver a product / service for which the customer is willing to pay more than the sum of the costs of
all activities in the value chain.

EFE & CPM










BLUE OCEAN STRATEGY


SUN TZU ART of WAR

Kindly ponder the Islamic perspective of business . It is in the form of  Charity and not war or competition.......

DIAGRAM OF PIAM / FIVE FORCES MODEL


PHILOSOPHY,VISION,MISSION & OBJECTIVE OF UiTM


KEY TERMS IN SM


KEY TERMS IN STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT
A. Strategists - are individuals who are most responsible for the success or failure of an organization. Strategists hold various job titles, such as chief executive officers, president, owner, chair of the board, executive director, chancellor, dean, or entrepreneur.

B. Vision and Mission Statements
1. Vision statements answer the question: “What do we want to become?”
2. Mission statements are “enduring statements of purpose that distinguish one business from other similar firms. A mission statement identifies the scope of a firm’s operations in product and market terms.” It addresses the basic question that faces all strategists: “What is our business?” It should include the values and priorities of an organization.


External Opportunities and Threats
1. External opportunities and external threats refer to economic, social, cultural, demographic, environmental, political, legal, governmental, technological, and competitive trends and events that could significantly benefit or harm an organization in the future.
2. Opportunities and threats are largely beyond the control of a single organization, thus the term external.


Internal Strengths and Weaknesses
1. Internal strengths and internal weaknesses are an organization’s controllable activities that are performed especially well or poorly.
2. Identifying and evaluating organizational strengths and weaknesses in the functional areas of a business is an essential strategic-management activity.
3. Strengths and weaknesses are determined relative to competitors and may be determined by both performance and elements of being.

Long-Term Objectives
1. Objectives can be defined as specific results that an organization seeks to achieve in pursuing its basic mission.
2. Long term means more than one year.


Strategies
1. Strategies are the means by which long-term objectives will be achieved. Business strategies may include geographic expansion, diversification, acquisition, product development, market penetration, retrenchment, divestiture, liquidation, and joint venture.

Annual Objectives
1. Annual objectives are short-term milestones that organizations must achieve to reach long-term objectives.
2. Like long-term objectives, annual objectives should be measurable, quantitative, challenging, realistic, consistent, and prioritized.


Policies
1. Policies are the means by which annual objectives will be achieved. Policies include guidelines, rules, and procedures established to support efforts to achieve stated objectives.
2. Policies are most often stated in terms of management, marketing, finance/accounting, production/operations, research and development, and computer information systems activities.

COMPARING BUSINESS & MILITARY


COMPARING BUSINESS AND MILITARY STRATEGY


A Strong Military Heritage Underlies the Study of Strategic Management
1. Terms such as objectives, mission, strengths, and weaknesses were first formulated to address problems on the battlefield.
2. A fundamental difference between military and business strategy is that business strategy is formulated, implemented, and evaluated with the assumption of competition, while military strategy is based on an assumption of conflict.
3. The similarities between military and business strategy can be seen in Sun Tzu’s The Art of War.( To know the detail ..Read on )

The Strategic Model & The 3 Stages of SM


The Strategic Management Model 
The framework illustrated by Fred David is a widely accepted, comprehensive model of the strategic-management process. This model does not guarantee success, but it does represent a clear and practical approach for formulating, implementing, and evaluating strategies. The strategic-management process is dynamic and continuous. A change in any one of the major components in the model can necessitate a change in any or all of the other components.

3 STAGES OF STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT


Strategy formulation includes developing a vision and mission, identifying an organization’s external opportunities and threats, determining internal strengths and weaknesses, establishing long-term objectives, generating alternative strategies, and choosing particular strategies to pursue.


Strategy implementation requires a firm to establish annual objectives, devise policies, motivate employees, and allocate resources so that formulated strategies can be executed; strategy implementation includes developing a strategy-supportive culture, creating an effective organizational structure, redirecting marketing efforts, preparing budgets, developing and utilizing information systems, and linking employee compensation to organizational performance.


Strategy evaluation is the final stage in strategic management. Managers desperately need to know when particular strategies are not working well; strategy evaluation is the primary means for obtaining this information.




Thursday 29 March 2012

Magic Phrase ...

This line should be in the mind of the students because when you were asked whether you have studied Strategic Management , you would not just answering them by only saying MGT657 but at least saying it loud and confidently this magic phrase...
Art & science of formulating, implementing, and evaluating, cross-functional decisions that enable an organization to achieve its objectives. If you are still not able to memorise this line..better do it now ... At least...this is a  proof that I've thought you Strategic Management..

The Contributions Of Industrial Organization to SM


This is a good article for students to further understand the concept of Industrial Organization view from chapter 3-
Kindly read on ...

The Contributions of Industrial Organization to Strategic Management
Michael E. Porter
The Academy of Management Review, Vol. 6, No. 4. (Oct., 1981), pp. 609-620.
Stable URL:


The Academy of Management Review is currently published by Academy of Management.

Wednesday 28 March 2012

Assalammualaikum w.b.t.

This blog will be the medium for me (Kamsol Mohamed Kassim) to share my knowledge and thoughts with my students. And this blog will be the official site for the Strategic Management students. Do interpret it as a platform for new way to comprehend SM ...As Strategic Management means- Art & science of formulating, implementing, and evaluating, cross-functional decisions that enable an organization to achieve its objectives